Expert voices from the Global South

A platform for experts to share analysis and insight

As the US–Iran 60-Day Deadline Nears, Hormuz Diplomacy Could Reshape Gulf Security

Photo: Majid Asgaripour/WANA, Reuters

The 60-day period agreed between the United States and Iran is nearing its end, with Washington once again increasing economic pressure on Tehran. President Donald Trump has announced further measures aimed at tightening the economic cost for Iran, while a renewed military escalation appears, at least for now, less likely. At the same time, an important development is taking place between Iran and Oman, which are negotiating directly over the future management of the Strait of Hormuz.

  • Washington is increasing economic pressure on Iran.

  • Tehran and Muscat are advancing talks over the Strait of Hormuz.

  • Iran and Oman are both crucial actors because of their positions on opposite sides of the Strait.

  • Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other Gulf states also have strong incentives to avoid another regional war.

  • If negotiations advance, regional states may increasingly try to manage these crises themselves rather than depending as heavily on Washington.

  • This could also affect the future US military presence in the Gulf and the willingness of some regional states to allow their bases, territory or airspace to be used in a future conflict with Iran.

If Iranian-Omani negotiations continue to advance, Hormuz could become an important test of whether Gulf states are moving towards a more regionally driven security framework. This would not mean the end of the US role in the Gulf, but it could gradually reduce Washington’s centrality in crisis management. The larger question is therefore not only what happens when the 60-day period expires, but whether the current diplomatic process marks the beginning of a more autonomous regional approach to managing tensions with Iran.

Author: Mikael Darbinian is a former US diplomat, geopolitical and military analyst and founder of Security Observer. He specialises in foreign policy analysis, military affairs and international security.

From Uprising to Strategy: Why Africa’s Collective Security Architecture Must Integrate Gen Z and Civil Society

Photo:Aljazeera/Archive From the storming of Kenya’s Parliament in June 2024 to the fall of Andry Rajoelina’s government in Madagascar[…]

THE INDIAN OCEAN IS NO LONGER NEUTRAL:The New Architecture of Global Power, when geography Becomes Power

The New Battle for Maritime Power, Chokepoints and Strategic Influence. That title gives you room to develop a much[…]

The US–Iran MoU Has Expired: Could a New Regional Alliance Increase Pressure on Tehran?

Photo: Keystone Pictures USA/ZUMAPRESS.com /NTB The memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran is no longer in force.[…]

ADS-B Air defence Asymmetric warfare Bab el-Mandeb Ballistic missiles China commercial shipping Defence analysis Democracy Donald Trump Drones Drone warfare Energy Security Flight tracking Geopolitics global trade Gulf of Aden Gulf security Gulf states Horn of Africa Houthis Indian Ocean International relations Iran Israel Maritime Chokepoints maritime risk Maritime security maritime threats Maritime Trade Mauritius Middle East Middle East security Military aviation Military logistics Military technology Missile interception MLAT Mode S naval operations Naval Security Oil markets Open-source intelligence OSINT Pakistan Poland port security Qatar Red Sea Regional Security Russia Russia-Ukraine war Sanctions Saudi Arabia Shipping Routes shipping security Somalia Somali piracy Strait of Hormuz Strategic Autonomy Strategic depth Supply chain security Turkey Ukraine United States War of attrition Yemen